How to Choose Between a 1-Vessel, 2-Vessel, or 3-Vessel Brewhouse

1. Introduction

Selecting the right brewhouse configuration is one of the most critical decisions when setting up a brewery. The choice between a 1-vessel, 2-vessel, or 3-vessel system impacts:
✔ Brewing efficiency
✔ Batch turnaround time
✔ Beer quality and consistency
✔ Space and budget requirements

This guide compares each system’s advantages, limitations, and ideal use cases to help you make an informed decision.Micet Craft Brewing Equipment Manufacturers

2. Understanding Brewhouse Vessel Functions

Before comparing systems, let’s define the core vessels in a traditional brewhouse:

• Mash Tun (MT) – Where grains are mixed with hot water to convert starches into sugars.
• Lauter Tun (LT) – Separates sweet wort from spent grains.
• Boil Kettle (BK) – Boils wort with hops for sterilization and flavor extraction.
• Whirlpool (WP) – Clarifies wort by removing hop and protein debris (sometimes combined with BK).

The number of vessels refers to how many of these functions are handled in separate or combined units.

3. 1-Vessel Brewhouse (All-in-One System)

How It Works

• A single vessel performs mashing, lautering, boiling, and whirlpooling.
• Common in nano-breweries, homebrew setups, and pilot systems.

Pros

✔ Lowest cost (fewer tanks, less plumbing)
✔ Compact footprint (ideal for small spaces)
✔ Simpler operation (fewer transfers, less risk of contamination)

Cons

✖ Longer brew days (sequential steps mean no overlapping processes)
✖ Lower efficiency (difficult to optimize each step independently)
✖ Limited scalability (hard to increase batch sizes without major upgrades)

Best For

• Homebrewers transitioning to pro brewing
• Nano-breweries (1-3 BBL batches)
• Experimental or small-batch breweries

4. 2-Vessel Brewhouse (Mash/Lauter Tun + Boil Kettle/Whirlpool)

How It Works

• Vessel 1: Combined mash tun + lauter tun
• Vessel 2: Combined boil kettle + whirlpool

Pros

✔ Faster than 1-vessel (can mash next batch while boiling the first)
✔ Better efficiency (dedicated lautering improves wort clarity)
✔ Moderate cost (balances price and functionality)

Cons

✖ Still some bottlenecks (cannot lauter and boil simultaneously)
✖ Less flexibility than 3-vessel systems

Best For

• Small to mid-sized craft breweries (5-15 BBL)
• Brewpubs with limited space
• Breweries focusing on ales (less need for decoction mashing)

5. 3-Vessel Brewhouse (Mash Tun, Lauter Tun, Boil Kettle + Whirlpool)

How It Works

• Vessel 1: Dedicated mash tun
• Vessel 2: Dedicated lauter tun
• Vessel 3: Dedicated boil kettle + whirlpool (or separate whirlpool)

Pros

✔ Highest efficiency (each step optimized independently)
✔ Fastest production (can mash, lauter, and boil simultaneously)
✔ Best for complex beers (decoction mashing, step infusions)

Cons

✖ Highest cost (more vessels, larger footprint)
✖ More complex operation (requires skilled staff)

Best For

• Commercial production breweries (15+ BBL)
• Lager breweries (precise temperature control needed)
• High-volume brewpubs

6. Key Decision Factors

A. Batch Size & Production Goals

System Recommended Batch Size Batches/Day 1-Vessel 1-3 BBL 1-2 2-Vessel 5-15 BBL 2-3 3-Vessel 15+ BBL 3-5

B. Space Requirements

• 1-Vessel: ~100 sq ft
• 2-Vessel: ~200 sq ft
• 3-Vessel: ~300+ sq ft

C. Budget Comparison

System Estimated Cost (USD) 1-Vessel 10,000−10,000−50,000 2-Vessel 50,000−50,000−150,000 3-Vessel 150,000−150,000−500,000+

D. Beer Styles

• Ales (1 or 2-vessel): Less need for precise step mashing.
• Lagers (3-vessel): Benefit from decoction and protein rests.

7. Hybrid & Advanced Systems

Semi-Automated 2-Vessel Systems

• Use RIMS (Recirculating Infusion Mash System) for better control.
• Popular among 10-20 BBL breweries.

4+ Vessel Systems

• Add dedicated whirlpool or hot liquor tank (HLT).
• Used by large regional breweries.

8. Case Studies

Nano-Brewery (1-Vessel)

• Batch Size: 1 BBL
• Output: 2 batches/day
• Savings: ~$30K vs. 2-vessel

Craft Brewery (2-Vessel)

• Batch Size: 7 BBL
• Output: 3 batches/day
• Best Balance: Cost vs. efficiency

Production Brewery (3-Vessel)

• Batch Size: 30 BBL
• Output: 5 batches/day
• ROI: Higher volume justifies cost

9. Future-Proofing Your Decision

• Start small? Some 1-vessel systems allow modular expansion.
• Planning to scale? A 2-vessel system may offer better long-term value.
• Already at capacity? A 3-vessel system maximizes output and quality.

10. Conclusion

• 1-Vessel: Best for small batches, tight budgets, and nano-breweries.
• 2-Vessel: Ideal for growing craft breweries needing efficiency without huge costs.
• 3-Vessel: The choice for high-volume production and lagers.

Recommendation: Match your system to your batch size, beer styles, and 5-year growth plan.

FAQs

1. Can I upgrade from a 1-vessel to a 2-vessel system later?

Yes, but retrofitting can be costly. If planning to expand within 2 years, consider starting with a 2-vessel system.

2. Which system is best for hazy IPAs?

A 2-vessel system is sufficient (whirlpool hop stands matter more than vessel count).

3. Do I need a 3-vessel system for lagers?

Not mandatory, but helpful for decoction mashing and precise temp control. Some 2-vessel systems with HERMS can also work.

vist:Micet Craft Brewing Equipment Turnkey Solutions - Micet Group